Відео

you should join my classes for ISO 27001 complete implementation course, please whatsapp me on +91 971 860 3114

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

sure whatsapp +91 971 860 3114

sure whatsapp +91 971 860 3114

please whatsapp on +91 971 860 3114

please get in touch with me on whatsapp. +91 971 860 3114

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Sure, I can explain the difference between Integrated Platform Environment (IPE) and Integrated User Configuration (IUC) with examples. Integrated Platform Environment (IPE) IPE refers to a unified computing environment where different software and tools are integrated to provide a cohesive and efficient platform for development, testing, deployment, and management of applications. IPE typically includes various components such as operating systems, development frameworks, middleware, databases, and other tools that work together seamlessly. Example: Imagine a cloud-based development platform like Microsoft Azure or AWS. These platforms offer a comprehensive suite of tools and services that allow developers to build, deploy, and manage applications in an integrated environment. For instance, Azure provides services like Azure DevOps for CI/CD, Azure SQL Database for database management, and Azure Functions for serverless computing, all within a unified platform. This integration helps streamline the development process and improves productivity. Integrated User Configuration (IUC) IUC, on the other hand, focuses on the personalization and configuration settings that are tailored to individual users within a system. It encompasses the settings, preferences, and customizations that make the user experience unique and optimized for each user. IUC ensures that users have a personalized and consistent experience across different devices and sessions. Example: Consider the user settings on a Windows operating system. Each user can configure their desktop environment, including wallpaper, screen resolution, installed applications, and system preferences. When a user logs into their account on any Windows machine within an organization, these personalized settings are applied automatically, providing a consistent user experience. This personalized configuration can also extend to software applications, where users can set their preferences for the user interface, default behaviors, and other settings. Summary of Differences: Scope: IPE focuses on the integration of various software and tools within a computing environment, while IUC focuses on user-specific settings and preferences. Purpose: IPE aims to provide a cohesive and efficient development and deployment platform, whereas IUC aims to personalize and optimize the user experience. Components: IPE involves multiple integrated tools and services (e.g., development frameworks, databases), while IUC involves user-specific configurations (e.g., UI preferences, application settings).

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Certainly! Here's a comparison of Proofpoint CASB + DLP, Symantec DLP, and Microsoft Purview DLP, focusing on their key differences: Proofpoint CASB + DLP Proofpoint CASB (Cloud Access Security Broker): Cloud Security: Monitors and controls the use of cloud applications, providing visibility into cloud activity and enforcing security policies. Threat Protection: Identifies and mitigates threats within cloud environments, such as malware and compromised accounts. Compliance: Ensures compliance with industry standards by enforcing policies and providing audit trails. Proofpoint DLP (Data Loss Prevention): Content Inspection: Analyzes content to prevent sensitive data from leaving the organization. Policy Enforcement: Applies policies to control data movement based on content and context. Integration: Seamless integration with Proofpoint’s email and cloud security solutions. Symantec DLP Symantec DLP (Data Loss Prevention): Comprehensive Coverage: Protects sensitive data across endpoints, networks, storage, and cloud. Advanced Detection: Uses machine learning and data fingerprinting to accurately identify sensitive data. Incident Response: Provides detailed incident analysis and automated response capabilities. Unified Management: Centralized policy management and reporting for all data protection activities. Integration: Integrates with various Symantec security solutions, including endpoint protection and encryption. Microsoft Purview DLP Microsoft Purview DLP (Data Loss Prevention): Microsoft Ecosystem Integration: Deep integration with Microsoft 365 services (e.g., Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams). Unified Management: Single pane of glass for managing data protection policies across Microsoft services. Real-time Alerts and Reporting: Real-time monitoring, alerting, and detailed reporting. Built-in AI and Machine Learning: Utilizes Microsoft’s AI capabilities to enhance data protection and policy enforcement. Compliance and Regulations: Supports compliance with various industry standards and regulations. Data Sensitivity Labels: Leverages sensitivity labels to classify and protect data based on predefined or custom policies. Key Differences Integration and Ecosystem: Proofpoint: Best suited for organizations heavily using Proofpoint’s suite for email and cloud security. Symantec: Provides broad protection across various platforms and integrates well with other Symantec solutions. Microsoft Purview: Ideal for organizations deeply invested in Microsoft 365, offering seamless integration with Microsoft services. Detection and Enforcement: Proofpoint: Emphasizes threat protection in cloud environments and integrates with their existing email and cloud security solutions. Symantec: Strong in advanced detection techniques such as data fingerprinting and machine learning. Microsoft Purview: Leverages Microsoft’s AI and machine learning capabilities for enhanced data classification and protection. Deployment and Management: Proofpoint: Offers both cloud and on-premises deployment options, managed through Proofpoint’s interface. Symantec: Typically requires more complex deployment, but offers comprehensive management through a centralized console. Microsoft Purview: Managed within the Microsoft 365 Compliance Center, providing a unified management experience for Microsoft users. Compliance and Reporting: Proofpoint: Provides detailed compliance and audit trails, particularly within cloud environments. Symantec: Known for robust incident response and detailed reporting capabilities. Microsoft Purview: Offers real-time monitoring and compliance reporting, with a focus on integration within Microsoft 365.

@@LearnITSecuritywithLuvJohar Thank you.

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

@@LearnITSecuritywithLuvJohar yup

An ISO 27001 gap analysis provides a high-level overview of what needs to be done to achieve certification and enables you to assess and compare your organisation's existing information security arrangements against the requirements of ISO 27001.

sure you can whatsapp me on 971 860 3114

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

of course test environments are needed

ChatGPT If you're unable to directly obtain the user access modification date and have to rely on last modified date, there are a few strategies you can employ to ensure the completeness of the user access modification list: Request Historical Data: First, request historical user access logs covering a longer period, ideally for the entire year if possible. Explain the necessity of having a comprehensive understanding of user access modifications for your analysis. Cross-Reference with Other Sources: Check if there are any other systems or sources within your organization that might have records or logs of user access modifications. Sometimes, access changes might be logged in multiple places for auditing or security purposes. Compare with User Activity: While last modified date might not directly indicate access modification, it could still correlate with user activity. Cross-reference the last modified dates with any other user activity logs or systems to identify potential instances where access modifications might have occurred. Interview Key Personnel: Reach out to relevant personnel within your organization who might have knowledge or insights into user access modifications. This could include system administrators, IT support staff, or department heads who oversee access permissions. Analyze Patterns and Anomalies: Even with limited data, you can analyze patterns and anomalies in the provided logs to identify potential instances of user access modifications. Look for unusual spikes or patterns in access changes that might indicate modification activities. Implement Ongoing Monitoring: Going forward, implement a system or process for ongoing monitoring of user access modifications. This could involve setting up alerts for access changes or regularly reviewing access logs to ensure that no modifications are missed in the future.

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

@@LearnITSecuritywithLuvJohar already did 😊

thanks

whatsapp at +91 971 860 3114

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

whatsapp at +91 971 860 3114

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

t.me/LuvJoharFreeTechnologyTrainings

this is telegram link

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Yes, Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions can support UDP (User Datagram Protocol) to some extent, but it's less common compared to TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) support. UDP is connectionless and doesn't have the built-in mechanisms for ensuring data integrity and order like TCP does. However, some WAFs may have capabilities to inspect UDP packets for various purposes such as DDoS protection, application layer security, or protocol validation. It ultimately depends on the specific features and capabilities of the WAF in question.

@@LearnITSecuritywithLuvJohar thanks for quick response

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Your teaching style is fantastic.

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel

Yes, there are several open-source GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) tools available besides Eramba. Some of them include: OpenGRC: OpenGRC is an open-source governance, risk, and compliance platform designed to help organizations manage their risk and compliance requirements efficiently. It offers features such as risk assessment, compliance management, policy management, and more. Oparach: Oparach is another open-source GRC platform that focuses on helping organizations streamline their governance, risk, and compliance processes. It provides features like risk assessment, control management, compliance tracking, and reporting. OpenRMF: OpenRMF is an open-source risk management framework designed to assist organizations in managing their information security risks effectively. It provides features such as risk assessment, risk mitigation planning, control implementation, and compliance monitoring. Open-Audit: Open-Audit is an open-source auditing and compliance tool that helps organizations automate the auditing process and ensure compliance with various regulatory requirements. It offers features like asset discovery, software inventory, compliance reporting, and more.

@@LearnITSecuritywithLuvJohar thank you

Thanks 🤗 please share these videos and help me grow this channel